<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plugging In &amp; Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amancuso.org/215/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amancuso.org/blog/215</link>
	<description>Unorthodox Creativity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Triumphant Return! &#124; AMancuso.org</title>
		<link>http://amancuso.org/blog/215/comment-page-1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>A Triumphant Return! &#124; AMancuso.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amancuso.org/?p=215#comment-105</guid>
		<description>[...] last post was over a month ago and talked about my need to unplug. Well, true to personal form, I hit one extreme after the other and completely abandoned Twitter, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last post was over a month ago and talked about my need to unplug. Well, true to personal form, I hit one extreme after the other and completely abandoned Twitter, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifton Hill</title>
		<link>http://amancuso.org/blog/215/comment-page-1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifton Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amancuso.org/?p=215#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Hear, hear! Totally understand. You are not alone. And the biggest problem is that if you build a following, without content you are farther from your goal (in my mind), than the reverse. I think having a following is good, but having a book is better. Finding that perfect balance is not going to be easy. I know I don&#039;t have it yet either.

Best of luck and Happy New Year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear! Totally understand. You are not alone. And the biggest problem is that if you build a following, without content you are farther from your goal (in my mind), than the reverse. I think having a following is good, but having a book is better. Finding that perfect balance is not going to be easy. I know I don&#8217;t have it yet either.</p>
<p>Best of luck and Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://amancuso.org/blog/215/comment-page-1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amancuso.org/?p=215#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Double arse! I don&#039;t believe I forgot to fill in the name &amp; email bit twice and lost everything I typed. It was quite eloquent as well, if not particularly constructive to your situation. 

Mostly along the lines of my online/offline balance is only a balance on a macro timescale. On a more granular timescale, I pendulum between bursts of online activity and days avoiding the computer as though the weight of all those words was too much of a burden. I consider myself lucky to have such understanding friends.  I guess I could be content with the &#039;balance&#039; but I&#039;m not happy with it. 

But my online activities are social, not trying to build anything in particular, I&#039;m motivated to &#039;not be alone&#039; and to explore my own creativity - but under that there&#039;s avoiding rejection and finding a voice. For my survival I only have the energy to do one or the other &#039;properly&#039; at a time.  But survival isn&#039;t living.  At least I don&#039;t use eating to express myself so much any more!

Maybe if you get to the motives under the motives - why do you want to be published, to see your book on a shelf, for example, or for recognition - then perhaps new paths and activities or ways of combining things will be available to discover. And a balance will present itself, combining the things you do do with the things you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Double arse! I don&#8217;t believe I forgot to fill in the name &amp; email bit twice and lost everything I typed. It was quite eloquent as well, if not particularly constructive to your situation. </p>
<p>Mostly along the lines of my online/offline balance is only a balance on a macro timescale. On a more granular timescale, I pendulum between bursts of online activity and days avoiding the computer as though the weight of all those words was too much of a burden. I consider myself lucky to have such understanding friends.  I guess I could be content with the &#8216;balance&#8217; but I&#8217;m not happy with it. </p>
<p>But my online activities are social, not trying to build anything in particular, I&#8217;m motivated to &#8216;not be alone&#8217; and to explore my own creativity &#8211; but under that there&#8217;s avoiding rejection and finding a voice. For my survival I only have the energy to do one or the other &#8216;properly&#8217; at a time.  But survival isn&#8217;t living.  At least I don&#8217;t use eating to express myself so much any more!</p>
<p>Maybe if you get to the motives under the motives &#8211; why do you want to be published, to see your book on a shelf, for example, or for recognition &#8211; then perhaps new paths and activities or ways of combining things will be available to discover. And a balance will present itself, combining the things you do do with the things you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
